This image from the UNC-Chapel Hill site illustrates what happens when news aggregators run wild and unchecked. Here are a few troubling things about this:
- The headline style is inconsistent: Up or down? Pick one and stick with it.
- The story links are redundant.
- Editorials, op-eds or analysis pieces (assuming that's what the Woodward story is) are not labeled as such.
- The Kiss headline is baffling. It turns out that the story has only one paragraph about a dispute over royalties, so the headline is also a bait and switch.
- The Ivory Coast headline has an odd list at the end for no apparent reason.
- The headline on the Vegas school story needs a semicolon.
A human editor could bring sense and reason to this mess. This is why copy editing and news judgment need to be as important and valued on the Web as they have been in print.
I think you proved, by clicking on the Kiss link, that the "headline" did its work... Links on a Web page serve a much different purpose than headlines in a newspaper. And, I think the fact that the Woodward item is included in the same group -- and probably got as many, if not more, clicks than the Kiss link -- shows how little most Web readers care about the distinction between "news analysis" and "news."